Which limitation was NOT imposed on armies according to the resolutions made in the Disarmament Conference?

Which limitation was NOT imposed on armies according to the resolutions made in the Disarmament Conference?

• A. Bombing civilians
• B. Use of chemical weapons
• C. Limiting artillery
• D. Number of soldiers in each army

Answer: (D)

The limitation that was not imposed on armies according to the resolutions made in the Disarmament Conference is related to the number of soldiers in each army. The Disarmament Conference focused on reducing the quantity and destructiveness of military equipment, such as artillery and chemical weapons, and aimed to address methods of warfare that could lead to more civilian casualties, such as bombing civilians. While several treaties and agreements resulted from the Disarmament Conference that sought to limit or regulate various military technologies and strategies, restrictions on the size of armies themselves were not a primary focus or result of the discussions. Countries were generally more concerned with the potential for large armies to engage in total war, and thus the emphasis was placed on controlling the arms that could be used by these armies rather than on limiting personnel. This distinction shows that, despite concerns regarding military aggression and capability, states retained greater autonomy regarding the numbers of personnel within their armed forces.

The limitation that was not imposed on armies according to the resolutions made in the Disarmament Conference is related to the number of soldiers in each army. The Disarmament Conference focused on reducing the quantity and destructiveness of military equipment, such as artillery and chemical weapons, and aimed to address methods of warfare that could lead to more civilian casualties, such as bombing civilians.

While several treaties and agreements resulted from the Disarmament Conference that sought to limit or regulate various military technologies and strategies, restrictions on the size of armies themselves were not a primary focus or result of the discussions. Countries were generally more concerned with the potential for large armies to engage in total war, and thus the emphasis was placed on controlling the arms that could be used by these armies rather than on limiting personnel. This distinction shows that, despite concerns regarding military aggression and capability, states retained greater autonomy regarding the numbers of personnel within their armed forces.